Depleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody cures new-onset diabetes, prevents recurrent autoimmune diabetes, and delays allograft rejection in nonobese diabetic mice

BACKGROUND: The prevention of recurrent autoimmunity is a prerequisite for successful islet transplantation in patients with type I diabetes. Therapies effective in preserving pancreatic beta-cell mass in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes are good candidates for achieving this goal. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and antilymphocyte antisera are the only therapies to date that have cured early diabetic disease in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse. We investigated whether other immunosuppressive therapies, including short-term depleting anti-CD4 mAb or costimulation blockade, would affect the disease progression in recently diabetic NOD mice. We also evaluated the effect of the anti-CD4 mAb on syngeneic and allogeneic graft survival in diabetic NOD recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We demonstrate that a short course of anti-CD4 mAb early after hyperglycemia onset cured diabetes. Normal islets and islets with CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell peri-insulitic infiltrate were found in the pancreata of cured NOD mice. A similar regimen prevented the recurrence of autoimmune diabetes in NOD/severe combined immunodeficient disease (SCID) islet isografts and delayed the rejection of allogeneic C57BL/6 islet allografts in diabetic female NOD mice. The co-transfer of diabetogenic splenocytes with splenocytes from anti-CD4 mAb-treated and cured NOD mice into 7-week-old, irradiated, NOD male mice was not able to protect from diabetes occurrence. This indicates that an anti-CD4-mediated cure of diabetes is independent of the induction of immunoregulatory T cells. Anti-CD154 mAb and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin were ineffective in early-onset diabetes. CONCLUSION: Our results provide the first evidence that newly established autoimmune islet destruction in NOD mice responds to a short course of anti-CD4 mAb. In contrast, costimulation blockade is ineffective in this clinically relevant model.     

Aggressive skin allograft rejection in CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40/CD40L costimulatory pathway.

CD28-/- mice have been utilized to study the role of B7/CD28 and B7-CTLA4 interactions. There is evidence that CTLA4 ligation may be critical for tolerance induction. The aim of the current study is to further investigate rejection responses of CD28-/- mice and to define the role of B7-CTLA4 interactions in the absence of the CD40 and CD28 pathways. Balb/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 (B6) wild type or CD28-/- mice treated with anti-CD40L, CTLA4-Ig, or combination blockade. To investigate the cellular mechanism of rejection in CD28-/- recipients, mice were treated with anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibodies prior to treatment with costimulation blockade. The fluoroscein dye CFSE was utilized to study T cell expansion in vivo. Surprisingly, treatment of B6 CD28-/- mice with CTLA4-Ig alone (MST 12d), anti-CD40L alone (MST 13d), or combined blockade (MST 13d) had no effect on allograft survival compared to untreated B6 CD28 mice (MST 11d). CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD4+ cells and treated with CTLA4-Ig, anti-CD40L, or combination blockade also did not have prolonged survival compared with untreated mice (MST 10d). In contrast, CD28-/- recipients depleted of CD8+ cells had markedly prolonged allograft survival when treated with either anti-CD40L alone (MST 49d) or with combination blockade (MST 57d). Studies utilizing CFSE demonstrated that CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are not defective in in vivo proliferation responses compared with wild type CD8 cells. Thus, CD28-/- CD8+ T cells are responsible for aggressive rejection responses of CD28-/- mice independent of the CD40 pathway. In addition, CD40L blockade does not result in CD4+ T cell tolerance in CD28 recipients, despite an intact B7-CTLA4 pathway.     

Changes in expression of T-cell activation-related molecules and cytokines during tolerance induction in an allogeneic skin transplantation murine model

Bone marrow transplantation after treatment with busulfan and costimulatory blockade with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4)-Ig and anti-CD154 mAb or two-signal blockade using anti-CD45RB and anti-CD154 mAb are nonmyeloablative treatment regimens for allogeneic transplantation. There may be differences in the mechanisms of donor cell engraftment and reactive cell deletion by which these regimens induce donor-specific tolerance. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate changes in T cells and cytokines during tolerance induction toward allogeneic skin grafts. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were used as donors and recipients, respectively. Skin and bone marrow transplantations were performed and busulfan was administered. Three groups were treated with mAb as follows: group 1, anti-CD154 mAb; group 2, anti-CD154 plus anti-CD45RB mAb; and group 3, anti-CD154 mAb plus CTLA4-Ig. The proportions of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells and the expression of CD45RB isoforms on splenocytes were measured using flow cytometry and the production of cytokines by CD4+ T cells using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Group 2 showed a significant reduction in the proportions of CD8+ T cells and CD45RB high isoforms compared with groups 1 and 3. The levels of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-4 in group 2 were lower and higher than those of groups 1 and 3, respectively. In conclusion, the combined use of anti-CD154 and anti-CD45RB mAb decreases the CD8+ T-cell population and the expression of CD45RB, resulting in a Th2 cytokine profile, which may be a characteristic mechanism leading to donor cell engraftment and reactive cell deletion for donor-specific tolerance.     

Normal Donor Bone Marrow is Superior to Flt3 Ligand-Mobilized Bone Marrow in Prolonging Heart Allograft Survival when Combined with Anti-CD40L (CD154)

Flt3 ligand (FL) administration markedly increases bone marrow (BM) stem cells and immature dendritic cells. We investigated the influence of CD40-CD40Ligand (CD154) pathway blockade on antidonor immunity, cytokine production, microchimerism and heart graft survival in BALB/c (H2d) recipients of fully allogeneic C57BL/10 (H2b) FL-mobilized BM (FL-BM) or normal BM. Anti-CD40L mAb strongly suppressed anti-donor T-cell proliferative responses in recipients of either normal or FL-BM, but was less efficient in inhibiting antidonor cytolytic T-cell (CTL) activity, especially in recipients of FL-BM. Interestingly, CD40L blockade was more effective in recipients of multiple compared with single donor BM infusions. Anti-donor cytokine responses revealed complete impairment of IFN-gamma, IL-4 and IL-10 production in recipients of normal BM and CD40L mAb. By contrast, and in agreement with the CTL data, mice given FL-BM retained ability to produce IFN-gamma CD40-CD40L blockade did not promote microchimerism, as evidenced by immunohistology and real time polymerase chain reaction. Nevertheless, anti-CD40L mAb enhanced heart allograft survival in recipients of FL-BM, but the effect was inferior to that achieved with normal BM. These data provide insight into the influence of growth factor-expanded donor BM and costimulation blockade on antidonor immune reactivity and transplant outcome. The comparatively poor outcome obtained using FL-BM plus anti-CD40L mAb in this model may be ascribed to the failure of effectively interdicting antidonor CTL activity.     

4-1BB promotes long-term survival in skin allografts treated with anti-CD45RB and anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies

4-1BB (CD137) is a T-cell co-stimulatory molecule that promotes T cell activation. Using a skin transplantation model, we observed that simultaneous administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting CD45RB and CD40L prolonged skin allograft in co-stimulation blockade (CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD40L mAb)-resistant mice, because of reducing CD8(+) T cells and CD4(+) CD45RB(high) T cells. Anti-CD45RB mAb (45RB) blocks the activation of T helper 1 (Th1) cells and generates regulatory T cells (T(reg)). The experimental design included five groups: group 1, control; group 2, 45RB-MR1; group 3, 45B-MR1 + 4-IBBL; group 4, anti-CD4 mAb plus group 3 treatment; group 5, anti-CD8 mAb plus group 3 treatment. In this study we highlight the involvement of 4-1BB/4-1BBL in the development of T-cell responses. C57BL/6 recipients of BALB/c skin grafts were treated with 45RB, anti-CD40L mAb (MR1), and antagonistic anti-4-1BBL mAb (4-1BBL) on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 posttransplantation. Additional 4-1BBL further prolonged skin graft survival, although the percentage of splenocyte-derived CD8(+) T cells was reduced similarly in both groups. Use of 4-1BBL seems to have additive effects on T(reg) cells, which play a major role in the maintenance of tolerance. Even after immunosuppressive therapy in combination with CD4(+) T-cell depletion, we did not achieve prolonged graft survival, possibly because of the absense of T(reg) cells, which require CD4-independent CD8(+) T cells, based on the observation of increasing proportion of CD8(+) T cells in similar degree as the control group.     

基因转移CTLA4-Ig和抗CD154抗体在异种胰岛移植排斥反应中的作用

目的 探讨基因转移细胞毒性T细胞相关抗原4免疫球蛋白(CTLA4-Ig)和抗T细胞分化群154(CD154)抗体在异种胰岛移植排斥反应中的作用及机理.方法 建立人-大鼠异种胰岛移植模型,用携带CTLA4-Ig基因的重组腺病毒感染移植胰岛细胞,并用抗CD154抗体进行治疗,观察糖尿病大鼠胰岛移植后血糖变化、生存情况及移植物病理形态学改变,检测移植物CTLA4-Ig、胰岛素的表达和移植大鼠白细胞介素2(IL-2)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α的水平变化.结果 (1)糖尿病大鼠移植后2 d血糖降至正常,对照组血糖平均在移植后8 d升高,抗体治疗组、转染组和联合治疗组血糖分别在18、25和36 d升高.(2)对照组、抗体治疗组、转染组和联合治疗组的移植物存活时间分别为(10.0±2.1)d、(22.0±8.2)d、(28.0±6.5)d和(37.0±9.3)d,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);移植大鼠生存时间分别为(21.0±5.7)d、(35.0±6.5)d、(48.0±8.5)d和(65.0 ±12.5)d,各组间比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).(3)对照组在移植后1周内,IL-2、TNF-α的水平均急剧上升,较移植前显著升高(P＜0.01).(4)各治疗组移植物见成片的胰岛细胞团,未见淋巴细胞浸润,转染组和联合治疗组移植物可见CTLA4-Ig和胰岛素的表达.结论 基因转移CTLA4-Ig和抗CD154抗体均可抑制异种胰岛移植排斥反应,二者联合效果优于单独使用.     

Inhibition of cellular immune responses to encapsulated porcine islet xenografts by simultaneous blockade of two different costimulatory pathways

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of human islets has been successful clinically. Since human islets are scarce, we are studying microencapsulated porcine islet xenografts in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. We have evaluated the cellular immune response in NOD mice with and without dual costimulatory blockade. METHODS: Alginate-poly-L-lysine-encapsulated adult porcine islets were transplanted i.p. in untreated diabetic NODs and NODs treated with CTLA4-Ig to block CD28/B7 and with anti-CD154 mAb to inhibit CD40/CD40-ligand interactions. Groups of mice were sacrificed on subsequent days; microcapsules were evaluated by histology; peritoneal cells were analyzed by FACS; and peritoneal cytokines were quantified by ELISA. Controls included immunoincompetent NOD-Scids and diabetic NODs given sham surgery or empty microcapsules. RESULTS: Within 20 days, encapsulated porcine islets induced accumulation of large numbers of macrophages, eosinophils, and significant numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells at the graft site, and all grafts were rejected. During rejection, IFNgamma, IL-12 and IL-5 were significantly elevated over sham-operated controls, whereas IL-2, TNFalpha, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-1beta and TGFbeta were unchanged. Treatment with CTLA4-Ig and anti-CD154 prevented graft destruction in all animals during the 26 days of the experiment, dramatically inhibited recruitment of host inflammatory cells, and inhibited peritoneal IFNgamma and IL-5 concentrations while delaying IL-12 production. CONCLUSIONS: When two different pathways of T cell costimulation were blocked, T cell-dependent inflammatory responses were inhibited, and survival of encapsulated islet xenografts was significantly prolonged. These findings suggest synergy between encapsulation of donor islets and simultaneous blockade of two host costimulatory pathways in prolonging xenoislet transplant survival.     

Prevention of kidney allograft rejection using anti-CD40 and anti-CD86 in primates

BACKGROUND: Costimulation blockade has been proposed to induce allograft tolerance. We combined an antagonist anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody (mAb) with an antagonist anti-CD86 mAb in a rhesus monkey kidney allograft model. We chose this combination because it leaves CD80-CD152 signaling unimpaired, allowing for the down-regulatory effect of CD152 signaling to take place through this pathway. METHODS: Rhesus monkeys underwent transplantation with a major histocompatibility complex-mismatched kidney. One group of animals received anti-CD40 alone, and a second group received the combination of anti-CD40 and anti-CD86, twice weekly for 56 days. RESULTS: Three animals with low levels of anti-CD40 rejected the transplanted kidney while still receiving treatment. Three animals with high levels of anti-CD40 rejected at days 91, 134, and 217 with signs of chronic rejection. Animals treated with the combination of anti-CD40 and anti-CD86 mAbs rejected their kidneys at days 61, 75, and 78, shortly after cessation of treatment. Two animals were killed on days 71 and 116 with a blocked ureter. These animals developed virtually no signs of tubulitis or infiltration during treatment and no donor-specific alloantibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment protocols prevented rejection for the duration of the treatment in most animals. Blocking costimulation by anti-CD40 or by anti-CD40 plus anti-CD86 may be an effective method to prevent graft rejection and may obviate the need for other immunosuppressive drugs, especially in the immediate posttransplantation period.     

Anti-LFA-1 improves pig islet xenograft function in diabetic mice when long-term acceptance is induced by CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L

BACKGROUND: It has been previously demonstrated that addition of anti-LFA-1 to a combination of CTLA4Ig and anti-CD40L induces the permanent acceptance of dopaminergic fetal pig xenografts when transplanted into the brain of wild-type mice. The purpose of this study was to test whether this costimulation blockade also can induce acceptance of adult pig islets transplanted to C57BL/6 mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. METHODS: Recipients were treated with CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L+/-anti-LFA-1 or isotype control antibodies during the first week after transplantation. Half of the costimulation blockade-treated recipients had their grafts removed after 8 weeks. The other half was observed up to 5 months. RESULTS: Recipients treated with CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L/anti-LFA-1 had significantly lower blood glucose and gained more weight than CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L-treated recipients. CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L-treated recipients exhibited unstable blood glucose. IPGTT of these recipients revealed a slow recovery to normal blood glucose levels at week 4. In comparison, CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L/anti-LFA-1 treated recipients exhibited a significantly superior glucose clearance. CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L+/-anti-LFA-1 treated recipients did not produce anti-pig IgG, whereas control antibody-treated mice did. CD4+ T cells from costimulation blockade-treated recipients proliferated less than CD4+ T cells from control antibody-treated mice when co-cultured with syngeneic antigen presenting cells loaded with pig islet antigens. CONCLUSIONS: CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L/anti-LFA-1-treated recipients had superior islet function compared with CTLA4Ig/anti-CD40L-treated recipients. However, both costimulation blockade regimens led to islet graft acceptance up to 5 months after a 1-week treatment.     

Costimulatory blockade induces hyporesponsiveness in T cells that recognize alloantigen via indirect antigen presentation

BACKGROUND: Blockade of T cell costimulation by treatment with donor-specific transfusion (DST) and anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces prolonged allograft survival in mice. This effect is due in part to deletion of host CD8 and CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by direct presentation. The fate of host CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by indirect presentation, however, is unclear. METHODS: We studied Tg361 TCR transgenic CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by indirect presentation. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester-labeled Tg361 cells were adoptively transferred into syngeneic nontransgenic recipients and their fate in the peripheral blood, spleen, and lymph nodes following treatment with DST and anti-CD154 was analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment of mice with DST plus anti-CD154 mAb does not delete Tg361 CD4 T cells, but instead renders them hyporesponsive to rechallenge with alloantigen. Mice circulating hyporesponsive CD4 T cells also fail to reject skin allografts. The hyporesponsive state of the T cells is not reversed by the addition of interleukin-2, anti-CD28 mAb, or an agonistic anti-CD134 mAb in the presence of antigen. These T cells are capable of activation, however, as evidenced by in vitro proliferation in response to anti-CD3 mAb. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that costimulation blockade can induce hyporesponsiveness of host CD4 T cells recognizing alloantigens by indirect presentation, thus prolonging graft survival by a mechanism that does not involve deletion of alloreactive T cells.     

New immunosuppressive agents in transplantation

Immunosuppressive agents have enabled the development of allogenic transplantation during the last 40 years, allowing considerable improvement in graft survival. However, several issues remain such as the nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors, the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens and/or the higher risk of opportunistic infections and cancers. Most immunosuppressive agents target T cell activation and may not be efficient enough to prevent allo-immunization in the long term. Finally, antibody mediated rejection due to donor specific antibodies strongly affects allograft survival.Many drugs have been tested in the last decades, but very few have come to clinical use. The most recent one is CTLA4-Ig (belatacept), a costimulation blockade molecule that targets the second signal of T cell activation and is associated with a better long term kidney function than calcineurin inhibitors, despite an increased risk of acute cellular rejection.The research of new maintenance long-term immunosuppressive agents focuses on costimulation blockade. Agents inhibiting CD40-CD40 ligand interaction may enable a good control of both T cells and B cells responses. Anti-CD28 antibodies may promote regulatory T cells. Agents targeting this costimulation pathways are currently evaluated in clinical trials.Immunosuppressive agents for ABMR treatment are scarce since anti-CD20 agent rituximab and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have failed to demonstrate an interest in ABMR. New drugs focusing on antibodies removal (imlifidase), B cell and plasmablasts (anti-IL-6/IL-6R, anti-CD38…) and complement inhibition are in the pipeline, with the challenge of their evaluation in such a heterogeneous pathology.     

CD2 is a Dominant Target for Allogeneic Responses

CD2 and 2B4 (CD244) are members of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily and are both ligands for another family member, CD48. CD2 is widely distributed on T, NK, and B cells and some antigen-presenting cells, while 2B4 is expressed on NK and some T cells and monocytes and is known to participate in NK cytotoxicity. Since indefinite allograft survival could be obtained by a combination of anti-CD48 plus anti-CD2 mAb administration, it was important to determine the role of 2B4 blockade in allograft rejection. MAbs directed against CD2, CD48, or 2B4 were administered singly or in pairs to cardiac allograft recipients. The experiments show that only anti-CD2 plus anti-CD48 mAbs result in indefinite allograft survival, while anti-CD2 plus anti-2B4 mAbs substantially prolong graft survival, and anti-CD48 plus anti-2B4 mAbs were no better than each mAb alone. The effect of these mAbs on anti-CD3 mAb and alloantigen-driven proliferation and IFN-gamma production were also assessed. In general, anti-CD2 inhibited both anti-CD3 mAb and alloantigen-driven responses, while anti-CD48 inhibited only anti-CD3 mAb but not alloantigen-driven proliferative and cytokine responses. Anti-2B4 mAbs were generally ineffective alone. Combinations of mAbs were more effective than single mAbs only in alloantigen-driven proliferation, commensurate with allograft survival results. Using CD2-/- and CD48-/- T cells and antigen-presenting cells, we also demonstrate that these inhibitory mAbs act primarily by blocking intercellular interactions, rather than directly delivering negative signals to T cells. These results suggest that, unlike CD2, 2B4 is not a potent regulatory molecule or ligand for CD48 in the response to alloantigen. Blocking the 2B4-CD48 receptor-ligand pair does not inhibit T-cell responses and alloreactivity to the same degree as CD2-CD48 blockade.     

Anti-CD154 or CTLA4Ig obviates the need for thymic irradiation in a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for the induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance

BACKGROUND: Thymic irradiation (TI) or repeated administration of T cell-depleting monoclonal antibodies (TCD mAbs) is required in a previously described non-myeloablative regimen allowing allogeneic marrow engraftment with stable mixed chimerism and tolerance. As both treatments might be associated with toxicity in the clinical setting, we evaluated whether T-cell costimulatory blockade could be used to replace them. METHODS: C57BL/6 mice received depleting anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs on day -5, 3 Gy whole body irradiation (day 0), and 15x10(6) fully MHC-mismatched, B10.A bone marrow cells. In addition, hosts were injected with an anti-CD154 mAb (day 0) and/or CTLA4Ig (day +2). Chimerism in peripheral blood was followed by flow cytometric (FACS) analysis, and tolerance was assessed by skin grafting, and also by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and cell-mediated lympholysis (CML) assays. The frequency of certain Vbeta families was determined by FACS to assess deletion of donor-reactive T cells. RESULTS: Chimerism was transient and tolerance was not present in animals receiving TCD mAbs on day -5 without costimulatory blockade. The addition of anti-CD154 and CTLA4Ig, alone or in combination, reliably permitted induction of high levels of stable (>6 months) multi-lineage chimerism, with specific tolerance to skin grafts and donor antigens by MLR and CML assays. Long-term chimeras showed deletion of donor-reactive CD4+ peripheral blood lymphocytes, splenocytes, and mature thymocytes. Administration of TCD mAbs only 1 day before bone marrow transplantation plus anti-CD154 also allowed induction of permanent chimerism and tolerance. CONCLUSIONS: One injection of anti-CD154 or CTLA4Ig overcomes the need for TI or prolonged host TCD in a preclinical model for the induction of mixed chimerism and deletional tolerance and thus further decreases the toxicity of this protocol. Achievement of tolerance with conditioning given over 24 hr suggests applicability to cadaveric organ transplantation.     

FasL is important in costimulation blockade-resistant skin graft rejection

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous blockade of the CD40 and CD28 costimulatory pathways is effective in prolonging allograft survival in murine and primate models. Recent data suggest that intact apoptotic pathways are crucial for the induction of hyporesponsiveness by costimulation blockade. We have studied the impact of fas/fasL signaling, an important T cell apoptotic pathway, on the effects of costimulation blockade. Methods. Wild type, lpr (fas deficient), and gld (fasL deficient), mice were used as donors and recipients in the murine skin graft model. Allograft survival was compared in untreated and costimulation blockade (500 microg anti-CD40L and 500 microg CTLA4-Ig, days 0, 2, 4, 6) treated recipients. In some recipients, CD4+ T cells were depleted using rat anti-murine CD4 (100 microg day -3, -2, -1, and weekly). RESULTS: gld mice treated with costimulation blockade enjoy a significantly greater increase in skin allograft survival than do wild-type mice. This effect is not replicated using lpr donors or recipients. Experiments in which CD4+ cells were depleted demonstrate that fasL is not necessary for CD8-mediated allograft rejection, and that depletion of CD4+ cells eliminates some of the survival advantage induced by costimulation blockade. CONCLUSIONS: FasL is not required for the establishment of costimulation blockade induced hyporesponsiveness, but rather appears to be required for normal costimulation blockade resistant rejection. Fas expression is not critical for costimulation blockade resistant rejection, suggesting that fasL may be interacting with other receptors. Further, it appears that CD4+ cells are important in the maintenance of allograft protection induced by costimulation blockade in this model.     

Marked inhibition of transplant vascular sclerosis by in vivo-mobilized donor dendritic cells and anti-CD154 mAb

BACKGROUND: Combination of donor dendritic cells (DC) and anti-CD40 Ligand (L) (CD154) monoclonal antibody (mAb) markedly prolongs heart or skin allograft survival, but the influence of this strategy in models of chronic rejection is unknown. Our aim was to ascertain the influence of in vivo-mobilized immature donor DC plus anti-CD40L mAb on vascular sclerosis in functional murine aortic allografts. METHODS: C3H He/J (C3H;H2k) mice received 2 x 106 freshly isolated, immunobead-purified (>90%) fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand-mobilized C57BL/10 (B10;H2b) CD11c+ DC intravenously (IV), together with 500 microg of anti-CD40L mAb (MR1) intraperitoneally (IP) on days -7, 0, 4, and 10. Controls received either no donor cells, no mAb, or were untreated. B10 aortic grafts were transplanted in the abdominal aorta on day 0. At day 30, antidonor T-cell proliferative and cytotoxic responses and both complement fixing and immunoglobulin (Ig)G alloantibody levels were determined. Grafts were harvested on days 30 and 60 and examined by histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: DC infusion alone enhanced ex vivo antidonor proliferative and cytotoxic T-cell activity. By contrast, complement-fixing alloantibody levels were reduced. Anti-CD40L mAb alone strongly suppressed each of these responses. Graft inflammatory cell infiltration, intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation, fibrosis, and elastic lamina disruption observed in untreated animals were reduced in response to anti-CD40L mAb or donor DC alone. Antidonor immune reactivity, including IgG levels, and intimal proliferation were all markedly suppressed to an overall greater extent in mice given both treatments. CONCLUSION: Whereas blockade of the CD40-CD40L pathway ameliorated transplant vasculopathy, preservation of near-normal vessel architecture was achieved by simultaneous administration of donor DC. This strategy represents a novel application of DC for suppression of chronic rejection.     

CD40 blockade combines with CTLA4Ig and sirolimus to produce mixed chimerism in an MHC-defined rhesus macaque transplant model

In murine models, T-cell costimulation blockade of the CD28:B7 and CD154:CD40 pathways synergistically promotes immune tolerance after transplantation. While CD28 blockade has been successfully translated to the clinic, translation of blockade of the CD154:CD40 pathway has been less successful, in large part due to thromboembolic complications associated with anti-CD154 antibodies. Translation of CD40 blockade has also been slow, in part due to the fact that synergy between CD40 blockade and CD28 blockade had not yet been demonstrated in either primate models or humans. Here we show that a novel, nondepleting CD40 monoclonal antibody, 3A8, can combine with combined CTLA4Ig and sirolimus in a well-established primate bone marrow chimerism-induction model. Prolonged engraftment required the presence of all three agents during maintenance therapy, and resulted in graft acceptance for the duration of immunosuppressive treatment, with rejection resulting upon immunosuppression withdrawal. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that upregulation of CD95 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells correlated with rejection, suggesting that CD95 may be a robust biomarker of graft loss. These results are the first to demonstrate prolonged chimerism in primates treated with CD28/mTOR blockade and nondepletional CD40 blockade, and support further investigation of combined costimulation blockade targeting the CD28 and CD40 pathways.     

New insights into the interactions between T-cell costimulatory blockade and conventional immunosuppressive drugs

OBJECTIVE: To determine the precise in vivo interaction between T-cell costimulatory blockade and conventional immunosuppression in transplantation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Blocking B7 or CD154 T-cell costimulatory activation pathways prevents allograft rejection in small and large animal transplant models and is considered a promising strategy for clinical organ transplantation. METHODS: A fully MHC-mismatched vascularized mouse cardiac allograft model was used to test the interactions between anti-CD154 or CTLA4Ig monotherapy and conventional immunosuppressive drugs in promoting long-term graft acceptance. The frequency of alloreactive T cell was measured by ELISPOT. Chronic rejection was examined by histology. RESULTS: Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody therapy abrogated the effect of a single-dose protocol of anti-CD154 therapy. In contrast, rapamycin acted synergistically with anti-CD154 therapy in promoting long-term allograft survival. The addition of calcineurin inhibitors did not abolish this synergistic effect. Intense CD154-CD40 blockade by a multiple-dose schedule of anti-CD154 resulted in long-term graft survival and profound alloreactive T-cell unresponsiveness and overcame the opposite effects of calcineurin inhibitors. CTLA4Ig induced long-term graft survival, and the effect was not affected by the concomitant use of any immunosuppressive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The widespread view that calcineurin inhibitors abrogate the effects of T-cell costimulatory blockade should be revisited. Sufficient costimulatory blockade and synergy induced by CD154 blockade and rapamycin promote allograft tolerance and prevent chronic rejection.     

Anti-CD40 therapy extends renal allograft survival in rhesus macaques

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients currently require lifetime immunosuppressive therapy, with its accompanying side effects. Biological agents that block T-cell costimulatory pathways are important components of strategies being developed to induce transplantation tolerance. The aim of this study was to test the effect of a novel chimeric anti-human CD40 monoclonal antibody (Chi 220), either alone or in combination with CTLA4-Ig, on the survival of renal allografts in a nonhuman primate model. METHODS: Captive-bred adolescent male rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) (4-10 kg) were used as recipients and donors. Four treatment protocols were tested: Chi220 monotherapy, CTLA4-Ig monotherapy, Chi220 combined with CTLA4-Ig, and H106 (anti-CD40L) combined with CTLA4-Ig. Control animals received human albumin. Recipients were followed for survival, renal allograft function as determined by measurement of serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine, chemistries (sodium, potassium, chloride, and bicarbonate), complete blood cell count (CBC) with differential, and the development of donor-specific alloantibody. RESULTS: Treatment with Chi220 for 14 days prolonged renal allograft survival (MST 38.5 vs. 7 days in untreated controls). Notably, simultaneous blockade of the CD28/B7 pathway did not further augment graft survival but did suppress the development of donor-specific antibodies, an effect not achieved with Chi220 alone, despite peripheral B cell depletion. Finally, treatment with Chi220 suppressed the primary immune response to cytomegalovirus, resulting in severe systemic manifestations. CONCLUSIONS: Blockade of the CD40 pathway with anti-CD40 mAb is immunosuppressive in a large animal, preclinical renal transplant model. The potential effect of this therapy on viral immune responses will be important to consider for the design of safe clinical trials.     

Critical Role for CD8+ T Cells in Allograft Acceptance Induced by DST and CD40/CD154 Costimulatory Blockade

Donor-specific transfusion (DST) and CD40/CD154 costimulation blockade is a powerful immunosuppressive strategy which prolongs survival of many allografts. The efficacy of DST and anti-CD154 mAb for prolongation of hepatocellular allograft survival was only realized in C57BL/6 mice that have both CD4- and CD8-dependent pathways available (median survival time, MST, 82 days). Hepatocyte rejection in CD8 KO mice which is CD4-dependent was not suppressed by DST and anti-CD154 mAb treatment (MST, 7 days); unexpectedly DST abrogated the beneficial effects of anti-CD154 mAb for suppression of hepatocyte rejection (MST, 42 days) and on donor-reactive alloantibody production. Hepatocyte rejection in CD4 KO mice which is CD8-dependent was suppressed by treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb therapy (MST, 35 days) but did not differ significantly from immunotherapy with anti-CD154 mAb alone (MST, 32 days). Induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by DST and anti-CD154 mAb immunotherapy was dependent on host CD8(+) T cells, as demonstrated by CD8 depletion studies in C57BL/6 mice (MST, 14 days) and CD8 reconstitution of CD8 KO mice (MST, 56 days). These studies demonstrate that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets contribute to induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by this immunotherapeutic strategy.