首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

固定点处组间生存率比较的统计检验法
引用本文:陈金宝,邱李斌,王北琪,曾洁,陈征.固定点处组间生存率比较的统计检验法[J].中华流行病学杂志,2015,36(2):186-188.
作者姓名:陈金宝  邱李斌  王北琪  曾洁  陈征
作者单位:南方医科大学公共卫生与热带医学学院生物统计系, 广州 510515;南方医科大学公共卫生与热带医学学院生物统计系, 广州 510515;南方医科大学公共卫生与热带医学学院生物统计系, 广州 510515;南方医科大学公共卫生与热带医学学院生物统计系, 广州 510515;南方医科大学公共卫生与热带医学学院生物统计系, 广州 510515
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81202288); 广州市科技计划(2012J5100023); 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20114433120010); 广东省大学创业创新训练计划(1212113039)
摘    要:组间生存曲线的比较是研究疾病预后的重要内容,目前常用Log-rank检验,但当生存曲线交叉或者两曲线后期开口较大,即比例假设不成立时,采用该法则失效。为此本文讨论适用这种情形的比较法。介绍两条生存曲线某固定点处生存率比较的5种(经典法、对数转换法、cloglog转换法、反正弦转换法和logit转换法)统计检验方法。通过实例分析发现,若用组间生存曲线整体检验的Log-rank检验法或Two-stage检验法均很难对两组生存率比较给出合理的结果,而选取几个固定点进行检验时,可得到固定时间点上组间生存率差异是否有统计学意义。在5种固定点时刻的检验方法中,以cloglog转换法最佳。

关 键 词:生存曲线  组间生存率比较  Kaplan-Meier估计  固定点
收稿时间:2014/9/27 0:00:00

Statistical methods for comparing survival rates at a fixed time point
Chen Jinbao,Qiu Libin,Wang Beiqi,Zeng Jie and Chen Zheng.Statistical methods for comparing survival rates at a fixed time point[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2015,36(2):186-188.
Authors:Chen Jinbao  Qiu Libin  Wang Beiqi  Zeng Jie and Chen Zheng
Affiliation:The Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;The Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;The Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;The Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;The Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
Abstract:Comparison of survival curves between two groups is an important part of disease prognosis study. Log-rank test is commonly used,but when the two curves'' later intersecting opening is too large,the proportion of assumptions is not established,thus the Log-rank test is ineffective. We introduces five statistical tests to compare two survival curves at a fixed time points:classic method,logarithmic transformation,cloglog transformation,arcsine transformation and logit transformation. Through the study we found that if the overall survival curves are difficult to compare between groups tested with Log-rank test method or Two-stage test method,the fixed time point test can effectively determine whether there was significant difference in survival rate at a fixed time point. Among the five fixed time point tests,cloglog transformation could give more precise result.
Keywords:Survival curves  Comparison of survival rates between groups  Kaplan-Meier estimate  Fixed time point
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号