Self‐Discrepancy and Eating Disorder Symptoms Across Eating Disorder Diagnostic Groups |
| |
Authors: | Tyler B. Mason Jason M. Lavender Stephen A. Wonderlich Ross D. Crosby Scott G. Engel Timothy J. Strauman James E. Mitchell Scott J. Crow Daniel Le Grange Marjorie H. Klein Tracey L. Smith Carol B. Peterson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Clinical Research, Neuropsychiatric Research Institute, Fargo, ND, USA;2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Fargo, ND, USA;3. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA;4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA;5. The Emily Program, St. Paul, MN, USA;6. Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA;7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin‐Madison, Madison, WI, USA;8. VA South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center;9. VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (IQuEST);10. Department of Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This study examined self‐discrepancy, a construct of theoretical relevance to eating disorder (ED) psychopathology, across different types of EDs. Individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN; n = 112), bulimia nervosa (BN; n = 72), and binge eating disorder (BED; n = 199) completed semi‐structured interviews assessing specific types of self‐discrepancies. Results revealed that actual:ideal (A:I) discrepancy was positively associated with AN, actual:ought (A:O) discrepancy was positively associated with BN and BED, and self‐discrepancies did not differentiate BN from BED. Across diagnoses, A:O discrepancy was positively associated with severity of purging, binge eating, and global ED psychopathology. Further, there were significant interactions between diagnosis and A:O discrepancy for global ED psychopathology and between diagnosis and A:I discrepancy for binge eating and driven exercise. These results support the importance of self‐discrepancy as a potential causal and maintenance variable in EDs that differentiates among different types of EDs and symptom severity. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association. |
| |
Keywords: | self‐discrepancy eating disorders bulimia nervosa anorexia nervosa binge eating disorder |
|
|