首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

容积旋转调强放疗中射野等中心选择对宫颈癌剂量学的影响
引用本文:邓佳,吴湘阳,常晓斌,张坤,何耀东,赵强.容积旋转调强放疗中射野等中心选择对宫颈癌剂量学的影响[J].现代肿瘤医学,2022,0(1):101-106.
作者姓名:邓佳  吴湘阳  常晓斌  张坤  何耀东  赵强
作者单位:1.陕西省肿瘤医院放疗科,陕西 西安 710061; 2.西安交通大学核科学与技术学院,陕西 西安 710049
基金项目:陕西省重点研发新计划项目(编号:2010KTZDSF02-03)。
摘    要:目的:采用容积旋转调强技术设计放疗计划,选择不同的射野等中心进行优化,讨论射野等中心的改变对宫颈癌容积旋转调强放疗剂量学的影响。方法:随机选取宫颈癌术后患者15例,在同一套CT图像上设计不同的VMAT计划,根据宫颈癌病例靶区几何形状特点,选择不同等中心位置制定四组不同计划,分别为:计划等中心为靶区几何中心,称为Center计划;计划等中心为靶区几何中心y方向上移9 cm,称为Y计划,计划等中心为靶区几何中心x方向左移7 cm,称为X计划,计划靶区几何中心y方向上移9 cm再向x方向左移7 cm,称为X-Y计划。比较分析四种方案的靶区及危及器官的剂量学参数。结果:Center和Y计划能够满足临床靶区及危及器官限量。相较于Center计划, Y、X、X-Y计划靶区覆盖率分别降低了0.36%、15.48%和6.52%;Y计划的适形度指数(CI)、均匀性指数(HI)、脊髓的Dmax、膀胱的V40、直肠的V40均优于 X计划和X-Y计划,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:宫颈癌术后病例的VMAT计划设计中,使用不同等中心设计计划,与等中心位置在几何中心相比,向y轴方向偏移,对靶区和危及器官的影响较小,变化范围在临床可接受范围之内;而等中心位置向x轴方向偏移,对靶区和危及器官影响较大。

关 键 词:宫颈癌  射野等中心  容积旋转调强  剂量学

The dosimetry effect of the different positions of isocenter for volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment of cervical cancer
DENG Jia,WU Xiangyang,CHANG Xiaobin,ZHANG Kun,HE Yaodong,ZHAO Qiang.The dosimetry effect of the different positions of isocenter for volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment of cervical cancer[J].Journal of Modern Oncology,2022,0(1):101-106.
Authors:DENG Jia  WU Xiangyang  CHANG Xiaobin  ZHANG Kun  HE Yaodong  ZHAO Qiang
Affiliation:1.Department of Radiation Oncology,Shaanxi Province Cancer Hospital,Shaanxi Xi'an 710061,China;2.School of Nuclear Science and Technology,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Shaanxi Xi'an 710049,China.
Abstract:Objective:To quantify the impact of the different positions of isocenter for volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment of postoperative cervical cancer cervical cancer.Methods:Fifteen patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy for cervical cancer were selected.According to different position of isocenter,four VMAT plans were disigned on the same CT image,including Center plan,Y plan,X plan and X-Y plan.The position of isocenter had been distributed in 4 positions:symmetry center of the target(Center plan),9 cm up in the Y direction of the symmetry center(Y plan),7 cm to the left in the X direction of the symmetry center(X plan),9 cm up in the Y direction and 7 cm to the left in the X direction of the symmetry center(X-Y plan).The conformity index and homogeneity index of target areas,dosimetric differences of organs-at-risk and monitor units were compared.Results:The center plan and Y plan were satisfied with the clinical requirements.Compared with the center plan,the target coverage of the Y,X and X-Y plans decreased by 0.36%,15.48%and 6.52%,respectively.Compared with X plan and X-Y plan,conformity index(CI),uniformity index(HI),the Dmax of spinal cord,the V40 of bladder,the V40 of the rectem were better in Y plan,with statistical significance(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the design of the VMAT plan for postoperative cases of cervical cancer,the isocenter position is offset from the y-axis,which is suitable for clinical application.However,the isocenter position is offset in the x-axis direction,which is not suitable for clinical application because the OAR is at higher dose.
Keywords:cervical cancer  isocenter optimization  volumetric modulated arc therapy  dosimetry
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代肿瘤医学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号