| 间歇训练改善大学生心肺适能效果的Meta分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李振,肖涛,王晨宇,甄洁.间歇训练改善大学生心肺适能效果的Meta分析[J].中国学校卫生,2021,42(3):448-453. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李振 肖涛 王晨宇 甄洁 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.郑州大学体育学院(校本部)，河南 450001 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2020年度教育部人文社科规划基金项目20YJA890029 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 比较不同类型间歇训练与持续训练对改善大学生心肺适能的效果，为大学生健康促进提供干预方法的证据支持。 方法 采用Meta分析的方法，检索Web of Science、PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus、the Cochrane Library和CNKI等数据库中建库至2020年4月1日关于传统高强度间歇训练(high-intensity interval training, HIIT)、重复冲刺训练(repeated-sprint training, RST)及短跑间歇训练(sprint-interval training, SIT)干预久坐不运动大学生的随机对照实验研究文献，由2名研究者独立对文献进行筛选、数据提取及偏倚风险的评估，采用Stata 16.0软件依次进行传统Meta分析及网状Meta分析。 结果 共纳入21篇文献728名样本；Meta分析显示HIIT(SMD=0.35，95%CI=0.10~0.60，P < 0.05), SIT(SMD=0.38，95%CI=0.05~0.70，P < 0.05)在提高VO2max指标上优于中等强度持续运动(moderate-intensity continuous training, MICT)、RST(SMD=-0.08，95%CI=-0.41~0.25，P>0.05)对比MICT差异无统计学意义；HIIT(SMD=0.40，95%CI=0.08~0.72，P < 0.05)、SIT(SMD=0.35，95%CI=0.03~0.67，P < 0.05)提高VO2max指标方面优于RST，HIIT与SIT(SMD=0.05，95%CI=-0.25~0.36，P>0.05)之间差异无统计学意义；4种训练方式提高VO2max指标的效果大小可能性排序为HIIT与SIT高于RST及MICT，且HIIT高于SIT，RST高于MICT。 结论 高强度间歇训练改善VO2max的效果整体优于MICT，且采用HIIT进行训练可能效果最好。
|
| 关 键 词： | 体育和训练 生长和发育 氧耗量 Meta分析 学生 |
| 收稿时间： | 2020-09-25 |
Interval training for cardiopulmonary fitness of college students: a network Meta-analysis |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Physical Education College of Zhengzhou University, Henan Student Physical Health promotion Research Center, Zhengzhou(450001), China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To compare the effects of different types of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity steady training on improving cardiorespiratory fitness of college students, and to provide evidence supporting intervention methods for health promotion of college students. Methods By using the method of Meta-analysis, Web of science, PubMed, Scopus and CNKI database was searched for randomized control trails regarding high-intensity intervention (HIIT), repeated-sprint training (RST) and sprint-interval training (SIT) among sedentary college students in April 1, 2020. Two independent researchers conducted literature filtering, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, as well as traditional Meta-analysis and network Meta-analysis by using Stata software version 16.0. Results A total of 21 articles and 728 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed that HIIT (SMD=0.35, 95%CI=0.10-0.60, P < 0.05) and SIT (SMD=0.38, 95%CI=0.05-0.70, P < 0.05) were significantly better than MICT, there was no statistical difference in RST (SMD=-0.08, 95%CI=-0.41-0.25, P>0.05) compared with MICT; HIIT (SMD=0.40, 95%CI=0.08-0.72, P < 0.05) and SIT (SMD=0.35, 95%CI=0.03-0.67, P < 0.05) were significantly better than RST, there was no significant difference between HIIT and SIT(SMD=0.05, 95%CI=-0.25-0.36, P>0.05). The ranking of the four training methods for improving the effect size of VO2max index was HIIT>SIT>RST>MICT. Conclusion The overall effect of high intensity interval training on VO2max is better than MICT, and HIIT training may be the best. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国学校卫生》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国学校卫生》下载全文 |
|
