| 影像学联合三种分子诊断技术诊断结核病的价值 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 曹楠楠 钟艺绮 司徒博 何永建 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.广东省中医院检验科，广东 广州 5101202.南方医科大学南方医院检验医学科，广东 广州 510515 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家自然科学基金81802116 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的评估GeneXpert MTB/RIF、TaqMan探针荧光定量PCR、RNA恒温扩增法3种不同原理的分子生物学检验方法联合影像学表现对结核病诊断的价值。方法收集胸部X线检查表现怀疑结核分枝杆菌感染的患者标本38例，以临床诊断结核病为金标准，比较GeneXpert MTB/RIF、TaqMan探针荧光定量PCR法、RNA恒温扩增法3种分子生物学检验方法的敏感度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果胸部X线检查怀疑结核分枝杆菌感染的患者中，23名临床诊断为结核病，15名临床排除结核病。GeneXpert MTB/RIF、TaqMan探针荧光定量PCR、RNA恒温扩增法检测的敏感度分别为87.0%、52.2%和13.0%，阴性预测值分别为83.3%、57.7%和43.2%，差异具有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。3种方法的阳性预测值均为100%。GeneXpert MTB/RIF方法的敏感度和阴性预测值最高，其次为TaqMan探针荧光定量PCR法，RNA恒温扩增法敏感度和阴性预测值最低。结论对于胸部X线检查怀疑结核分枝杆菌感染的患者，GeneXpert MTB/RIF检测结核分枝杆菌具有更高的敏感度，在结核病诊断中具有较好的辅助诊断价值，应推荐成为结核分枝杆菌感染检测的首选分子生物学方法。
|
| 关 键 词： | 结核分枝杆菌 胸部X线 GeneXpert MTB/RIF TaqMan探针荧光定量PCR RNA恒温扩增 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-04-27 |
Evaluation of the value of imaging combined with molecular diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of tuberculosis |
| |
| Authors: | Nannan CAO Yiqi ZHONG Bo SITU Yongjian HE |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Department of Laboratory Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China2.Department of Laboratory Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic value of three different molecular methods, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, TaqMan probe fluorescence quantitative PCR, and RNA constant temperature amplification, combined with imaging findings in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.MethodsWe collected 38 patient of suspected Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection on chest X-ray. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the three different molecular methods were compared. GeneXpert MTB/RIF, TaqMan probe fluorescence quantitative PCR, and RNA constant temperature amplification, when the clinical diagnosis of tuberculosis was taken as the gold standard.ResultsAmong the patients whose imaging findings were suspected of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, 23 were clinically diagnosed with tuberculosis, and 15 were clinically excluded from tuberculosis. The sensitivity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF, TaqMan probe fluorescence quantitative PCR, and RNA constant temperature amplification were 87.0%, 52.2% and 13.0%, respectively. The negative predictive value were 83.3%, 57.7% and 43.2%, respectively (P < 0.05). The positive predictive value of the three methods is 100%.GeneXpert MTB/RIF method had the highest sensitivity and negative predictive value, followed by TaqMan probe fluorescence quantitative PCR, and RNA isothermal amplification had the lowest sensitivity and negative predictive value.ConclusionFor patients with suspected imaging findings of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, GeneXpert MTB/RIF has higher sensitivity in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and good auxiliary diagnostic value in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. It should be recommended as a test for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《》下载全文 |
|
