| 二维灰阶超声分析BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节评估上调的原因 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王传阳 刘卫勇 叶磊 潘婷婷 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院南区 超声科，安徽 合肥 2300002.中国科学技术大学附属第一医院南区 普外科，安徽 合肥 230000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 安徽省自然科学基1908085QH363 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的分析二维灰阶超声对BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节评估上调的原因，提高超声识别乳腺良性结节的能力，减少过度诊断与治疗。方法回顾性分析我院2019年12月~2020年11月因乳腺结节住院患者380例，依据病理结果将超声BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节分为2组，结节上调组及结节一致组。将乳腺结节为良性但超声BI-RADS 4类结节认为结节上调组，其中女性68例，男性2例，年龄26~76岁(48.43±11.52岁)；将乳腺结节为恶性且超声BI-RADS 4类结节认为结节一致组，其中女性310例，男性0例，年龄26~87岁(52.84±11.28岁)。分析两组声像图征象，总结超声对BI-RADS 4类乳腺结节评估上调的原因，进行鉴别诊断。结果380例患者中，结节上调组70例(18.42%)，结节一致组310例(81.58%)。结节上调组中乳腺纤维腺瘤13例(18.57%)，导管内乳头状瘤12例(17.14%)，乳腺腺病7例(10.00%)，非哺乳期乳腺炎5例(7.14%)，良性叶状肿瘤3例(4.29%)，男性乳腺发育2例(2.86%)，乳腺小叶萎缩1例(1.43%)，2种以上良性结节并发27例(38.57%)；结节一致组中乳腺癌310例(100%)。超声征象:结节上调组中边界清晰，纵横比 < 1，边缘光整或呈大分叶状，粗大钙化多见，结节一致组中边界不清晰，纵横比>1，边缘成角或微小分叶状，微钙化多见，2组超声征象之间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论正确识别超声乳腺结节良、恶性征象，减少主观性诊断，能有效提高超声诊断良性结节准确率，提高诊断自信。
|
| 关 键 词： | 乳腺 良性结节 超声征象 |
| 收稿时间： | 2021-02-19 |
Up-regulation factors of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules by two-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound |
| |
| Authors: | Chuanyang WANG Weiyong LIU Lei YE Tingting PAN |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Department of Ultrasound, Southern District, First Affiliated Hospital, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China2.Department of General Surgery, Southern District, First Affiliated Hospital, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveTo explore the reasons of up-regulation of BI- RADS 4 breast nodules by two-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound and improve the ability of ultrasound to identify benign breast nodules so as to reduce over-diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA total of 380 cases of breast nodules hospitalized in our hospital from December 2019 to November 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the pathological results, the ultrasound BI-RADS 4 breast nodules were divided into two groups: the nodule up-regulation group and the nodule consistent group. Breast nodules are benign, but ultrasound BI-RADS 4 nodules were considered as up-regulation group, including 68 females and 2 males, aged from 26 to 76 years, with an average age of 48.43±11.52 years. The breast nodules were considered as malignant and the ultrasound BI-RADS 4 types were consistent, including 310 females and 0 males, aged from 26 to 87 years, with an average of 52.84 ± 11.28 years. The ultrasonographic features of the two groups were analyzed, and the reasons for the up-regulation of ultrasound evaluation of BI-RADS 4 breast nodules were summarized for differential diagnosis.ResultsFrom December 2019 to November 2020, there were 380 patients (100.00%) with Bi-RADS type 4 nodules, including 70 patients (18.42%) with up-regulated nodules and 310 patients (81.58%) with consistent nodules. There were 13 breast fibroadenomas (18.57%), 12 intraductal papillomas (17.14%), 7 breast adenopathy (10.00%), 5 non-lactation mastitis (7.14%), 3 benign phyllodes tumors (4.29%), 2 male breast development (2.86%), and 1 breast lobular atrophy(1.43%), 27 cases with more than two kinds of benign nodules. A total of 310 cases (100%) of breast cancer were in the same nodule group. Ultrasonographic signs: in the up-regulated nodule group, the boundary was clear, the aspect ratio was less than 1, the edge was smooth or lobulated, and coarse calcification was more common. In the consistent nodule group, the boundary was unclear, the aspect ratio was more than 1, the edge was angular or lobulated, and microcalcification was more common. There was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).ConclusionCorrect identification of benign and malignant signs of ultrasound breast nodules and reduction of subjective diagnosis can effectively improve the accuracy of ultrasound benign nodules and improve diagnostic confidence. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
| 点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《》下载全文 |
|
