| 中文版脑卒中后身体活动障碍量表的信效度评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 徐玉1,于洪宇1,张会君1,张红英2,郭镜3,于博1. 中文版脑卒中后身体活动障碍量表的信效度评价[J]. 现代预防医学, 2020, 0(7): 1254-1257 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 徐玉1 于洪宇1 张会君1 张红英2 郭镜3 于博1 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.锦州医科大学护理学院，辽宁 锦州 112000；2.锦州医科大学附属第一医院神经内科，辽宁 锦州 112000；3.锦州医科大学附属第三医院康复中心，辽宁 锦州 112000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 对脑卒中后身体活动障碍量表（the Barriers to Physical Activity after Stroke scale, BAPAS）进行汉化，并进行信效度评价，为脑卒中后身体活动障碍评估提供一种新的简便的测量工具。方法 采用便利抽样方法，抽取辽宁省锦州医科大学两所附属医院脑卒中333例患者为研究对象，应用SPSS20.0和AMOS22.0软件对数据进行统计分析。结果 量表的内容效度指数为 0.914，验证性因子分析显示:〖XC小五号.EPS;P〗/df=2.336， CFI=0.940，GFI=0.927， AGFI=0.899， NFI=0.900， TLI=0.928， IFI= 0.940， RMSEA=0.063,标准化模型回归系数为0.54～0.88。条目与总分Pearson相关系数为0.542～0.680，内部一致性 Cronbach’α系数为0.870，分半信度为0.872，重测信度为0.828。结论 中文版BAPAS信效度良好，可用于评价我国脑卒中后患者身体活动障碍。
|
| 关 键 词： | 脑卒中 身体活动障碍量表 信度 效度 |
Reliability and validity evaluation of Chinese version of the Barriers to Physical Activity after Stroke scale |
| |
| XU Yu,YU Hong-yu,ZHANG Hui-jun,ZHANG Hong-ying,GUO Jing,YU Bo. Reliability and validity evaluation of Chinese version of the Barriers to Physical Activity after Stroke scale[J]. Modern Preventive Medicine, 2020, 0(7): 1254-1257 |
| |
| Authors: | XU Yu YU Hong-yu ZHANG Hui-jun ZHANG Hong-ying GUO Jing YU Bo |
| |
| Affiliation: | *School of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 112000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | To translate the English version of the Barriers to Physical Activity after Stroke scale(BAPAS) into Chinese, to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of BAPAS, and to provides a new and simple measurement tool for physical activity disorder assessment after stroke. Methods A total of 333 patients with stroke in two affiliated hospitals of Jinzhou Medical University in Liaoning Province were selected by convenient sampling method. The data was analyzed by SPSS 20.0 and AMOS 22.0. Results The content validity index of the scale was 0.914. Confirmatory factor analysis showed taht χ2/df=2.336, CFI=0.940, GFI=0.927, AGFI=0.899, NFI=0.900, TLI=0.928, IFI=0.940, RMSEA=0.063, and the regression coefficient of the standardized model was 0.54-0.88. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the item and the total score was 0.542 to 0.680, the total Cronbach’α coefficient of the scale was 0.870, the split-half reliability was 0.872, and the test-retest reliability was 0.828. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Barriers to Physical Activity after Stroke scale has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate physical activity barriers in stroke patients in China. |
| |
| Keywords: | Stroke the Barriers to Physical Activity after Stroke scale Reliability Validity |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《现代预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
