| 《老年人外出障碍量表》的汉化及信效度检验 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张含静,' target='_blank'>,李松,张艳丽,张鑫宇,李玥桐,胡存杰,李红玉,王秀丽.《老年人外出障碍量表》的汉化及信效度检验[J].现代预防医学,2023,0(10):1853-1858. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张含静 ' target='_blank'> 李松 张艳丽 张鑫宇 李玥桐 胡存杰 李红玉 王秀丽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.锦州医科大学附属第一医院，辽宁 锦州，121000；2.锦州医科大学护理学院；3.空军军医大学第二附属医院；4.华中科技大学深圳医院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 对外出障碍量表进行汉化，并在中国老年群体中进行信效度检验。方法 遵循Brislin的翻译和跨文化适应模式，通过正反双译的方法对外出障碍量表进行汉化，在山东省青岛市便利选取311例老年人作为研究对象，采用条目分析进行区分效度分析，采用内部信度、外部信度、内容效度、探索性因子、验证性因子、多群组检验，效标关联效度进行信效度分析。结果 经过探索性因子分析得出2个因子特征值＞1，分别命名为外出社交障碍和外出安全感障碍，累计方差贡献率为51.063%。采用验证性因子分析，结果显示卡方自由度比值（c1/df）为1.559，近似误差均方根（RMSEA）为0.042，均在标准范围内，多群组分析显示外出障碍量表在不同性别的模型拟合效果相近。标准化回归系数为0.51~0.62,均大于0.4。各条目临界比值（CR）为 9.100~15.497，条目与总分间相关系数（r）为0.594~0.749（P<0.001）。总量表 Cronbach α系数为 0.782，外出安全感障碍、外出社交障碍两因子的Cronbach α系数分别为0.750、0.685，总量表的重测信度为 0.966。结论 中文版外出障碍量表具有良好的信效度，适用于中国老年群体外出障碍的测量。
|
| 关 键 词： | 外出障碍 量表 信度 效度 |
The chinesization and the reliability and validity of scale on barriers togoing out for the elderly |
| |
| ZHANG Han-jing,LI Song,ZHANG Yan-li,ZHANG Xin-yu,LI Yu-tong,HU Cun-jie,LI Hong-yu,WANG Xiu-li.The chinesization and the reliability and validity of scale on barriers togoing out for the elderly[J].Modern Preventive Medicine,2023,0(10):1853-1858. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Han-jing LI Song ZHANG Yan-li ZHANG Xin-yu LI Yu-tong HU Cun-jie LI Hong-yu WANG Xiu-li |
| |
| Affiliation: | *The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121000, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To sinicize the scale on barriers to going out and test its reliability and validity in Chinese elderly population. Methods Following Brislin’s translation and cross-cultural adaptation model, 311 elderly people in Qingdao were conveniently selected as the subjects of the study. Item analysis was used for discrimination analysis, and internal reliability, external reliability, content validity, exploratory factor confirmatory factor，criterion-related validity and Multi-group were used for reliability and validity analysis. Results After exploratory factor analysis, the characteristic values of two factors were more than 1, which were named as out-social barriers and out-security barriers respectively, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 51.063%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Chi-square degree of freedom ratio (χ1/df) was 1.559 and the root mean square error (RMSEA) was 0.042, both within the standard range. Multi-group analysis showed that the scale showed similar model fits in different genders. Standardized regression coefficients ranged from 0.51 to 0.62, all greater than 0.4. The critical ratio (CR) of each item ranged from 9.100 to 15.497, and the correlation coefficient (r) between item and total score ranged from 0.594 to 0.749 (P< 0.001). The Cronbach α coefficient of Security disorder outside and social disorder outside were respectively 0.750 and 0.685. The Cronbach α coefficient of the total scale was 0.782, and the retest reliability was 0.966. Conclusion The Chinese version of the scale on barriers to going out has good reliability and validity. And it is suitable for the measurement of out-going barriers in Chinese elderly population. |
| |
| Keywords: | Barriers to going out Scale Reliability Validity |
|
| 点击此处可从《现代预防医学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《现代预防医学》下载全文 |
|
